A8-9600 vs Xeon E5-2407 v2

A8-9600 vs Xeon E5-2407 v2 Performance Spectrum

A8-9600

4 / 4

3,295

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5-2407 v2

4 / 4

3,272

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-9600 vs Xeon E5-2407 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-9600 vs Xeon E5-2407 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-9600

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7 Series, while Xeon E5-2407 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Xeon E5-2407 v2.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E5-2407 v2

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,272 vs 3,295).
❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while A8-9600 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-9600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-9600.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-9600 better than Xeon E5-2407 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2407 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A8-9600 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-9600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-9600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-9600 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2407 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. A8-9600 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2407 v2 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-9600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-9600 vs Xeon E5-2407 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-9600

The A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,295 points. Launch price was $78.

Xeon E5-2407 v2

The Xeon E5-2407 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,272 points. Launch price was $476.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A8-9600 and Xeon E5-2407 v2 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A8-9600 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2407 v2 — a 34.5% clock advantage for the A8-9600 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A8-9600 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon E5-2407 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-9600 scores 3,295 against the Xeon E5-2407 v2's 3,272 — a 0.7% lead for the A8-9600. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-9600 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2407 v2.

Feature	A8-9600	Xeon E5-2407 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+42%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+29%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	10 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark	3,295	3,272
Geekbench 6 Single	607	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,415	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-9600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2407 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-9600	Xeon E5-2407 v2
Socket	AM4	LGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-9600) / not specified (Xeon E5-2407 v2). The A8-9600 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7 Series), while the Xeon E5-2407 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-9600 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-9600 rivals Pentium G4560.