
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $181 less on MSRP ($119 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4150 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌490% higher power demand at 295W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro WX 4150
2017Why buy it
- ✅85.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 25.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.8 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 295W, a 245W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 837 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Radeon Pro WX 4150
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 scores 837 versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 2,642 — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 leads by 215.7%. The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Boost clocks: 2495 MHz vs 1053 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 837 | 2,642+216% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+586% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 61.32 TFLOPS+3150% | 1.887 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2495 MHz+137% | 1053 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+1100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 384+586% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+1264% | 0.22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 4150 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4150. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 draws 295W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 142% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 295W | 50W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.8 | 52.8+1786% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 came in at $119, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 was 60.3% cheaper ($181 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 8.8 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 25.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $119-60% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.0 | 8.8+26% |
| Codename | Navi 31 | Baffin |
| Release | April 13 2023 | March 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #26 | #620 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















