A8-9600 vs Celeron N5100

A8-9600 vs Celeron N5100 Performance Spectrum

A8-9600

4 / 4

3,295

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N5100

4 / 4

3,305

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-9600 vs Celeron N5100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-9600 vs Celeron N5100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-9600

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7 Series, while Celeron N5100 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Celeron N5100.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,295 vs 3,305).
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.

Celeron N5100

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-9600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-9600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-9600.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N5100 better than A8-9600?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-9600 is ahead with a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N5100 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N5100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N5100 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N5100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N5100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-9600 vs Celeron N5100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-9600

The A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,295 points. Launch price was $78.

Celeron N5100

The Celeron N5100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,305 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A8-9600 and Celeron N5100 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A8-9600 versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N5100 — a 19.4% clock advantage for the A8-9600 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A8-9600 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron N5100 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the A8-9600 scores 3,295 against the Celeron N5100's 3,305 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron N5100. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-9600 vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N5100.

Feature	A8-9600	Celeron N5100
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+21%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+182%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+33%	1.5 MB (total)
Process	28 nm	10 nm-64%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark	3,295	3,305
Geekbench 6 Single	607	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,415	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-9600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N5100 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-9600	Celeron N5100
Socket	AM4	BGA1338
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-9600) / not specified (Celeron N5100). The A8-9600 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7 Series), while the Celeron N5100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-9600 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-9600 rivals Pentium G4560.