PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4360T vs Core i3-6100E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4360T vs Core i3-6100E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4360T

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Costs $87 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 14.7 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,294 vs 3,315).

Core i3-6100E

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4360T across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 23.9 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-6100E better than Core i3-4360T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-4360T is ahead with a 3.4% average FPS lead across 34 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6100E pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Core i3-4360T also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6100E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-6100E is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-6100E comes in 63.0% more expensive on MSRP at $225 MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. Core i3-4360T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 62.0% better value on paper (23.9 vs 14.7 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-6100E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4360T vs Core i3-6100E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4360T

The Core i3-4360T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,294 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-6100E

The Core i3-6100E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,315 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4360T and Core i3-6100E share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-4360T versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-6100E — a 16.9% clock advantage for the Core i3-4360T. The Core i3-4360T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-6100E uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4360T scores 3,294 against the Core i3-6100E's 3,315 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-6100E. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4360T vs 3 MB on the Core i3-6100E.

Feature	Core i3-4360T	Core i3-6100E
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+19%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)+33%	3 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	3,294	3,315

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4360T versus 2133 on the Core i3-6100E — the Core i3-6100E supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-6100E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i3-4360T	Core i3-6100E
Socket	LGA1150	—
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	64 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4360T) vs true (Core i3-6100E). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4360T) and Intel HD Graphics 530 (Core i3-6100E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4360T targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i3-4360T	Core i3-6100E
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	Intel HD Graphics 530
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-4360T was priced at $138, while the Core i3-6100E came in at $225. On launch pricing ($138 vs $225), Core i3-4360T was $87 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4360T delivers 23.9 pts/$ vs 14.7 pts/$ for the Core i3-6100E — making the Core i3-4360T the 47.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-4360T	Core i3-6100E
MSRP	$138-39%	$225
Performance per Dollar	23.9+63%	14.7
Release Date	2014	2015

Search Core i3-4360T on Amazon

Search Core i3-6100E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.