FX-9830P vs Ryzen Embedded R1600

FX-9830P

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2016

Ryzen Embedded R1600

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

FX-9830P

4 / 4

3,298

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Embedded R1600

2 / 4

3,276

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The FX-9830P is positioned at rank #835 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-9830P

#823

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1334%

#824

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1315%

#825

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1207%

#826

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1201%

#827

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1190%

#829

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1150%

#830

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1102%

#831

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1101%

#832

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1071%

#835

FX-9830P

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

100%

#836

Celeron M P4600

MSRP: $86|Avg: $15

100%

#838

Celeron 887

MSRP: $86|Avg: $15

99%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen Embedded R1600 (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	FX-9830P	Ryzen Embedded R1600
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($45)	✅ More affordable ($0)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)	✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-9830P (2016) relies on 28 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	FX-9830P	Ryzen Embedded R1600
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($45)	✅ More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

FX-9830P Benchmark Check

Ryzen Embedded R1600 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-9830P and Ryzen Embedded R1600

FX-9830P

The FX-9830P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen Embedded R1600

The Ryzen Embedded R1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,276 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-9830P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-9830P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the FX-9830P versus 3.1 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1600 — a 17.6% clock advantage for the FX-9830P (base: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The FX-9830P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-9830P scores 3,298 against the Ryzen Embedded R1600's 3,276 — a 0.7% lead for the FX-9830P.

Feature	FX-9830P	Ryzen Embedded R1600
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+19%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+15%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per module)+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	3,298	3,276

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-9830P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	FX-9830P	Ryzen Embedded R1600
Socket	FP4	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

The FX-9830P launched at $150 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 debuted at $0. At current prices ($45 vs $0), the Ryzen Embedded R1600 is $45 cheaper.