FX-9830P vs Ryzen Embedded R1600

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-9830P vs Ryzen Embedded R1600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-9830P vs Ryzen Embedded R1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-9830P

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded R1600 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.

Ryzen Embedded R1600

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-9830P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,276 vs 3,298).

Quick Answers

So, is FX-9830P better than Ryzen Embedded R1600?

Yes. FX-9830P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-9830P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-9830P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-9830P is the better buy right now. FX-9830P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (22.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R1600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

FX-9830P vs Ryzen Embedded R1600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-9830P

The FX-9830P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen Embedded R1600

The Ryzen Embedded R1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,276 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-9830P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-9830P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the FX-9830P versus 3.1 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1600 — a 17.6% clock advantage for the FX-9830P (base: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The FX-9830P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-9830P scores 3,298 against the Ryzen Embedded R1600's 3,276 — a 0.7% lead for the FX-9830P.

Feature	FX-9830P	Ryzen Embedded R1600
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+19%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+15%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per module)+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	3,298	3,276

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-9830P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	FX-9830P	Ryzen Embedded R1600
Socket	FP4	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FX-9830P was priced at $150, while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($150 vs $0), Ryzen Embedded R1600 was $150 cheaper.

Feature	FX-9830P	Ryzen Embedded R1600
MSRP	$150	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	22.0	—
Release Date	2016	2020

Search FX-9830P on Amazon

Search Ryzen Embedded R1600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.