Core i5-L16G7 vs FX-9830P

Core i5-L16G7 vs FX-9830P Performance Spectrum

Core i5-L16G7

5 / 5

3,280

0.0%

3,298

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-L16G7 vs FX-9830P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-L16G7 vs FX-9830P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-L16G7

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 35W, a 28W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (9 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while FX-9830P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-9830P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,280 vs 3,298).

FX-9830P

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i5-L16G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌400% higher power demand at 35W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-L16G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-9830P better than Core i5-L16G7?

Yes. FX-9830P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-9830P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-9830P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-9830P is the better buy right now. FX-9830P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (22.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-L16G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-L16G7 vs FX-9830P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-L16G7

The Core i5-L16G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FC-CSP1016. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 3,280 points. Launch price was $281.

FX-9830P

The FX-9830P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-L16G7 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the FX-9830P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-L16G7 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i5-L16G7 versus 3.7 GHz on the FX-9830P — a 20.9% clock advantage for the FX-9830P (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-L16G7 uses the Lakefield (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the FX-9830P uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-L16G7 scores 3,280 against the FX-9830P's 3,298 — a 0.5% lead for the FX-9830P.

Feature	Core i5-L16G7	FX-9830P
Cores / Threads	5 / 5+25%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.7 GHz+23%
Base Clock	1.4 GHz	3 GHz+114%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB (per module)+100%
Process	10 nm-64%	28 nm
Architecture	Lakefield (2020)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	3,280	3,298

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-L16G7 uses the FC-CSP1016 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-9830P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-L16G7	FX-9830P
Socket	FC-CSP1016	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4x-4267	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	9	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-L16G7) / not specified (FX-9830P). The Core i5-L16G7 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the FX-9830P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-L16G7 targets Mobile.