Core i5-L16G7
VS
Ryzen Embedded R1600

Core i5-L16G7 vs Ryzen Embedded R1600

Intel

Core i5-L16G7

5 Cores5 Thrd7 WWMax: 3 GHz2020
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1600

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i5-L16G7 is positioned at rank #1040 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-L16G7

#1028
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2514%
#1029
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2477%
#1030
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2274%
#1031
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2264%
#1032
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2243%
#1034
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2166%
#1035
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2077%
#1036
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2074%
#1037
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2018%
#1040
Core i5-L16G7
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
99%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1045
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1047
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#1048
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
97%
#1049
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#1050
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
96%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
95%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
95%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen Embedded R1600 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-L16G7 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-L16G7Ryzen Embedded R1600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Lakefield (2020) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-L16G7Ryzen Embedded R1600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-L16G7 and Ryzen Embedded R1600

Intel

Core i5-L16G7

The Core i5-L16G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FC-CSP1016. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 3,280 points. Launch price was $281.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1600

The Ryzen Embedded R1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,276 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-L16G7 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-L16G7 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i5-L16G7 versus 3.1 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1600 — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R1600 (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-L16G7 uses the Lakefield (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-L16G7 scores 3,280 against the Ryzen Embedded R1600's 3,276 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-L16G7. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i5-L16G7Ryzen Embedded R1600
Cores / Threads
5 / 5+150%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.1 GHz+3%
Base Clock
1.4 GHz
2.6 GHz+86%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB (per core)
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Lakefield (2020)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
3,280
3,276
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-L16G7 uses the FC-CSP1016 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-L16G7Ryzen Embedded R1600
Socket
FC-CSP1016
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4x-4267
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
9
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-L16G7) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R1600). The Core i5-L16G7 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-L16G7 targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i5-L16G7Ryzen Embedded R1600
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile