
A10 PRO-7800B
Popular choices:

Core i5-L16G7
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
A10 PRO-7800B
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅77.8% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-L16G7.
Trade-offs
- ❌828.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 7W.
Core i5-L16G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 7W instead of 65W, a 58W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10 PRO-7800B across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,280 vs 3,317).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10 PRO-7800B.
A10 PRO-7800B
2014Core i5-L16G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅77.8% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-L16G7.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 7W instead of 65W, a 58W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌828.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 7W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10 PRO-7800B across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,280 vs 3,317).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10 PRO-7800B.
Quick Answers
So, is A10 PRO-7800B better than Core i5-L16G7?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A10 PRO-7800B | Core i5-L16G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A10 PRO-7800B | Core i5-L16G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A10 PRO-7800B | Core i5-L16G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A10 PRO-7800B | Core i5-L16G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10 PRO-7800B and Core i5-L16G7

A10 PRO-7800B
A10 PRO-7800B
The A10 PRO-7800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,317 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-L16G7
Core i5-L16G7
The Core i5-L16G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FC-CSP1016. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 3,280 points. Launch price was $281.
Processing Power
The A10 PRO-7800B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-L16G7 offers 5 cores / 5 threads — the Core i5-L16G7 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A10 PRO-7800B versus 3 GHz on the Core i5-L16G7 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the A10 PRO-7800B (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The A10 PRO-7800B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-L16G7 uses Lakefield (2020) (10 nm). In PassMark, the A10 PRO-7800B scores 3,317 against the Core i5-L16G7's 3,280 — a 1.1% lead for the A10 PRO-7800B.
| Feature | A10 PRO-7800B | Core i5-L16G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 5 / 5+25% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+30% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+150% | 1.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+700% | 512 kB |
| Process | 28 nm | 10 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Lakefield (2020) |
| PassMark | 3,317+1% | 3,280 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 446 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A10 PRO-7800B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-L16G7 uses FC-CSP1016 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10 PRO-7800B versus LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i5-L16G7 — the Core i5-L16G7 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10 PRO-7800B supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10 PRO-7800B) vs 9 (Core i5-L16G7) — the A10 PRO-7800B offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A10 PRO-7800B | Core i5-L16G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | FC-CSP1016 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133 | LPDDR4x-4267+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+78% | 9 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 PRO-7800B) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-L16G7). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 (A10 PRO-7800B) and UHD Graphics (Core i5-L16G7) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 PRO-7800B targets Business Desktop, Core i5-L16G7 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A10 PRO-7800B rivals Core i3-4160.
| Feature | A10 PRO-7800B | Core i5-L16G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 | UHD Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Business Desktop | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













