
FX-9830P vs Xeon X3480

FX-9830P

Xeon X3480
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-9830P is positioned at rank 835 and the Xeon X3480 is on rank 981, so the FX-9830P offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-9830P
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X3480
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-9830P | Xeon X3480 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($45) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($48) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-9830P | Xeon X3480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+6%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($45) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($48) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-9830P and Xeon X3480

FX-9830P
The FX-9830P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon X3480
The Xeon X3480 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,327 points. Launch price was $612.
Processing Power
The FX-9830P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X3480's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the FX-9830P versus 3.73 GHz on the Xeon X3480 — a 0.8% clock advantage for the Xeon X3480 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The FX-9830P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon X3480 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the FX-9830P scores 3,298 against the Xeon X3480's 3,327 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon X3480.
| Feature | FX-9830P | Xeon X3480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.73 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.06 GHz+2% |
| L3 Cache | — | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per module)+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Lynnfield (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 3,298 | 3,327 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-9830P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X3480 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-9830P | Xeon X3480 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The FX-9830P launched at $150 MSRP, while the Xeon X3480 debuted at $612. At current prices ($45 vs $48), the FX-9830P is $3 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-9830P delivers 73.3 pts/$ vs 69.3 pts/$ for the Xeon X3480 — making the FX-9830P the 5.6% better value option.
| Feature | FX-9830P | Xeon X3480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-75% | $612 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45-6% | $48 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.3+6% | 69.3 |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













