FX-9830P vs Xeon X5570

FX-9830P vs Xeon X5570 Performance Spectrum

FX-9830P

4 / 4

3,298

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon X5570

4 / 8

3,306

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-9830P vs Xeon X5570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-9830P vs Xeon X5570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-9830P

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5570 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,298 vs 3,306).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5570, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Xeon X5570 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X5570

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5570 better than FX-9830P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5570 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-9830P is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5570 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5570 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5570 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon X5570 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. FX-9830P only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 6.1% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-9830P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

FX-9830P vs Xeon X5570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-9830P

The FX-9830P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon X5570

The Xeon X5570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,306 points. Launch price was $49.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-9830P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X5570's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the FX-9830P versus 3.33 GHz on the Xeon X5570 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the FX-9830P (base: 3 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The FX-9830P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon X5570 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the FX-9830P scores 3,298 against the Xeon X5570's 3,306 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon X5570.

Feature	FX-9830P	Xeon X5570
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+11%	3.33 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+2%	2.93 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per module)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark	3,298	3,306

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-9830P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5570 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	FX-9830P	Xeon X5570
Socket	FP4	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
RAM Channels	—	3
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (FX-9830P) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5570). Primary use case: Xeon X5570 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5570 rivals Core i3-2100.