
A8-7670K

Ryzen Embedded R1600
A8-7670K vs Ryzen Embedded R1600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A8-7670K vs Ryzen Embedded R1600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A8-7670K vs Ryzen Embedded R1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A8-7670K
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7 Graphics, while Ryzen Embedded R1600 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Ryzen Embedded R1600.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,267 vs 3,276).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $118 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded R1600 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌280% higher power demand at 95W vs 25W.
Ryzen Embedded R1600
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 95W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-7670K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A8-7670K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-7670K.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Embedded R1600 better than A8-7670K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A8-7670K vs Ryzen Embedded R1600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7670K
The A8-7670K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,267 points. Launch price was $90.


Ryzen Embedded R1600
The Ryzen Embedded R1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,276 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The A8-7670K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7670K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A8-7670K versus 3.1 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1600 — a 22.9% clock advantage for the A8-7670K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The A8-7670K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7670K scores 3,267 against the Ryzen Embedded R1600's 3,276 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R1600.
| Feature | A8-7670K | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+26% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+38% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+700% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Godaveri (2014−2016) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 3,267 | 3,276 |
Memory & Platform
The A8-7670K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | A8-7670K | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (A8-7670K) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R1600). The A8-7670K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7 Graphics), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-7670K rivals Core i3-4170.
| Feature | A8-7670K | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A8-7670K was priced at $118, while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($118 vs $0), Ryzen Embedded R1600 was $118 cheaper.
| Feature | A8-7670K | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $118 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.7 | — |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














