
A8-7670K

Xeon W3550
A8-7670K vs Xeon W3550 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A8-7670K vs Xeon W3550 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A8-7670K vs Xeon W3550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A8-7670K
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $176 less on MSRP ($118 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 150.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.7 vs 11.1 PassMark/$ ($118 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7 Graphics, while Xeon W3550 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3550, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
Xeon W3550
2009Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,251 vs 3,267).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 27.7 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $118 MSRP).
- ❌36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A8-7670K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-7670K.
Quick Answers
So, is A8-7670K better than Xeon W3550?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A8-7670K vs Xeon W3550 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7670K
The A8-7670K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,267 points. Launch price was $90.

Xeon W3550
The Xeon W3550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,251 points. Launch price was $235.
Processing Power
The A8-7670K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon W3550's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A8-7670K versus 3.33 GHz on the Xeon W3550 — a 15.8% clock advantage for the A8-7670K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The A8-7670K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon W3550 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7670K scores 3,267 against the Xeon W3550's 3,251 — a 0.5% lead for the A8-7670K.
| Feature | A8-7670K | Xeon W3550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+17% | 3.33 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+18% | 3.06 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+1500% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Godaveri (2014−2016) | Bloomfield (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 3,267 | 3,251 |
Memory & Platform
The A8-7670K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3550 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | A8-7670K | Xeon W3550 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (A8-7670K) / not specified (Xeon W3550). The A8-7670K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7 Graphics), while the Xeon W3550 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-7670K rivals Core i3-4170.
| Feature | A8-7670K | Xeon W3550 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A8-7670K was priced at $118, while the Xeon W3550 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($118 vs $294), A8-7670K was $176 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A8-7670K delivers 27.7 pts/$ vs 11.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W3550 — making the A8-7670K the 85.8% better value option.
| Feature | A8-7670K | Xeon W3550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $118-60% | $294 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.7+150% | 11.1 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















