A8-7670K vs Xeon W3550

AMD

A8-7670K

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon W3550

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.33 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

A8-7670K vs Xeon W3550 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7670K vs Xeon W3550 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7670K vs Xeon W3550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7670K

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $176 less on MSRP ($118 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
  • Delivers 150.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.7 vs 11.1 PassMark/$ ($118 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
  • Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7 Graphics, while Xeon W3550 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3550, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon W3550

2009

Why buy it

  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,251 vs 3,267).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 27.7 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $118 MSRP).
  • 36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.
  • No integrated graphics, while A8-7670K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-7670K.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-7670K better than Xeon W3550?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W3550 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A8-7670K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, A8-7670K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-7670K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
A8-7670K is the better buy right now. A8-7670K comes in $176 cheaper on MSRP at $118 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 150.4% better value on MSRP (27.7 vs 11.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A8-7670K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-7670K vs Xeon W3550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A8-7670K

The A8-7670K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,267 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Xeon W3550

The Xeon W3550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,251 points. Launch price was $235.

Processing Power

The A8-7670K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon W3550's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A8-7670K versus 3.33 GHz on the Xeon W3550 — a 15.8% clock advantage for the A8-7670K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The A8-7670K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon W3550 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7670K scores 3,267 against the Xeon W3550's 3,251 — a 0.5% lead for the A8-7670K.

FeatureA8-7670KXeon W3550
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+17%
3.33 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+18%
3.06 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Godaveri (2014−2016)
Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark
3,267
3,251
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7670K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3550 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA8-7670KXeon W3550
Socket
FM2+
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
2133
Max RAM Capacity
64
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A8-7670K) / not specified (Xeon W3550). The A8-7670K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7 Graphics), while the Xeon W3550 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-7670K rivals Core i3-4170.

FeatureA8-7670KXeon W3550
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7 Graphics
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A8-7670K was priced at $118, while the Xeon W3550 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($118 vs $294), A8-7670K was $176 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A8-7670K delivers 27.7 pts/$ vs 11.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W3550 — making the A8-7670K the 85.8% better value option.

FeatureA8-7670KXeon W3550
MSRP
$118-60%
$294
Performance per Dollar
27.7+150%
11.1
Release Date
2015
2009

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.