A8-7670K vs Core i3-4360T

CPU

GPU

A8-7670K

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2015

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i3-4360T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

A8-7670K vs Core i3-4360T Performance Spectrum

A8-7670K

4 / 4

3,267

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4360T

2 / 4

3,294

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7670K vs Core i3-4360T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7670K vs Core i3-4360T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7670K

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($118 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.7 vs 23.9 PassMark/$ ($118 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i3-4360T.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,267 vs 3,294).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Core i3-4360T

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-7670K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.9 vs 27.7 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $118 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-7670K.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-7670K better than Core i3-4360T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-7670K is ahead with a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4360T pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4360T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-7670K is the better buy right now. A8-7670K comes in $20 cheaper on MSRP at $118 MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-4360T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 16.0% better value on MSRP (27.7 vs 23.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-7670K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-7670K vs Core i3-4360T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7670K

The A8-7670K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,267 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i3-4360T

The Core i3-4360T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,294 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-7670K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4360T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7670K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A8-7670K versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-4360T — a 19.7% clock advantage for the A8-7670K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The A8-7670K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-4360T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7670K scores 3,267 against the Core i3-4360T's 3,294 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-4360T.

Feature	A8-7670K	Core i3-4360T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+22%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+12%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Godaveri (2014−2016)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,267	3,294

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7670K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4360T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A8-7670K versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4360T — the A8-7670K supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-7670K supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A8-7670K	Core i3-4360T
Socket	FM2+	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2133+33%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A8-7670K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (A8-7670K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4360T). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 Graphics (A8-7670K) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4360T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4360T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-7670K rivals Core i3-4170.

Feature	A8-7670K	Core i3-4360T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon R7 Graphics	HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A8-7670K was priced at $118, while the Core i3-4360T came in at $138. On launch pricing ($118 vs $138), A8-7670K was $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A8-7670K delivers 27.7 pts/$ vs 23.9 pts/$ for the Core i3-4360T — making the A8-7670K the 14.8% better value option.

Feature	A8-7670K	Core i3-4360T
MSRP	$118-14%	$138
Performance per Dollar	27.7+16%	23.9
Release Date	2015	2014

Search A8-7670K on Amazon

Search Core i3-4360T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.