A8-7670K vs Core i7-4610M

A8-7670K vs Core i7-4610M Performance Spectrum

A8-7670K

4 / 4

3,267

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-4610M

2 / 4

3,251

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7670K vs Core i7-4610M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7670K vs Core i7-4610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7670K

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7 Graphics, while Core i7-4610M needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i7-4610M.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $118 MSRP, while Core i7-4610M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i7-4610M

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-7670K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,251 vs 3,267).
❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-7670K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-7670K.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-7670K better than Core i7-4610M?

Yes. A8-7670K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-7670K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-7670K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-7670K is the better buy right now. A8-7670K comes in at an unclear MSRP at $118 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-7670K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-7670K vs Core i7-4610M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7670K

The A8-7670K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,267 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i7-4610M

The Core i7-4610M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,251 points. Launch price was $346.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-7670K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-4610M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7670K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A8-7670K versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-4610M — a 5.3% clock advantage for the A8-7670K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The A8-7670K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-4610M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7670K scores 3,267 against the Core i7-4610M's 3,251 — a 0.5% lead for the A8-7670K.

Feature	A8-7670K	Core i7-4610M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+5%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+20%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Godaveri (2014−2016)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,267	3,251

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7670K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4610M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-7670K	Core i7-4610M
Socket	FM2+	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A8-7670K) / not specified (Core i7-4610M). The A8-7670K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7 Graphics), while the Core i7-4610M requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-7670K rivals Core i3-4170.