A8-7670K
VS
Xeon L5609

A8-7670K vs Xeon L5609

AMD

A8-7670K

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Xeon L5609

4 Cores4 Thrd40 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-7670K is positioned at rank 628 and the Xeon L5609 is on rank 735, so the A8-7670K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-7670K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11257%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10637%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7723%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2327%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1843%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1612%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
923%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
911%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
830%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
830%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
820%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
798%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
787%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
784%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
777%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
100%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
99%
#628
A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $43
100%
#629
Core i3-8350K
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
100%
#630
Core i3-6320
MSRP: $160|Avg: $35
100%
#633
Pentium G3258
MSRP: $75|Avg: $72
99%
#634
Celeron G555
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
99%
#635
Celeron G530
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
99%
#636
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
99%
#637
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
#638
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#639
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
98%
#640
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#641
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
98%
#642
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon L5609

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14432%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2725%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2421%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1870%
#427
EPYC 7702P
MSRP: $4425|Avg: N/A
100%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
99%
#429
EPYC 7552
MSRP: $4025|Avg: $1650
99%
#431
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
MSRP: $5383|Avg: N/A
99%
#432
Xeon W-3245
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1200
98%
#433
Xeon Gold 6346
MSRP: $2708|Avg: $2195
97%
#735
Xeon L5609
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
100%
#737
Xeon E3-1245 v3
MSRP: $490|Avg: $490
100%
#747
Xeon E5-2403 v2
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
97%
#748
Xeon E3-1285 v4
MSRP: $556|Avg: $200
97%
#750
Xeon E3-1260L
MSRP: $294|Avg: $270
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($229) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon L5609 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightA8-7670KXeon L5609
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($43)
⚠️ Higher cost ($229)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A8-7670K ($43), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($186 less, 81% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightA8-7670KXeon L5609
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+428%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($43)
⚠️ Higher cost ($229)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-7670K and Xeon L5609

AMD

A8-7670K

The A8-7670K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,267 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Xeon L5609

The Xeon L5609 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the A8-7670K and Xeon L5609 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A8-7670K versus 1.86 GHz on the Xeon L5609 — a 70.8% clock advantage for the A8-7670K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The A8-7670K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon L5609 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7670K scores 3,267 against the Xeon L5609's 3,298 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon L5609.

FeatureA8-7670KXeon L5609
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+110%
1.86 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+94%
1.86 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Godaveri (2014−2016)
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark
3,267
3,298
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7670K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon L5609 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA8-7670KXeon L5609
Socket
FM2+
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
2133
Max RAM Capacity
64
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A8-7670K) / not specified (Xeon L5609). The A8-7670K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7 Graphics), while the Xeon L5609 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-7670K rivals Core i3-4170.

FeatureA8-7670KXeon L5609
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7 Graphics
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The A8-7670K launched at $118 MSRP, while the Xeon L5609 debuted at $229. At current prices ($43 vs $229), the A8-7670K is $186 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A8-7670K delivers 76.0 pts/$ vs 14.4 pts/$ for the Xeon L5609 — making the A8-7670K the 136.3% better value option.

FeatureA8-7670KXeon L5609
MSRP
$118-48%
$229
Avg Price (30d)
$43-81%
$229
Performance per Dollar
76.0+428%
14.4
Release Date
2015
2010