Celeron N5100 vs Ryzen Embedded R1600

Celeron N5100 vs Ryzen Embedded R1600 Performance Spectrum

Celeron N5100

4 / 4

3,305

+0.9%

3,276

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N5100 vs Ryzen Embedded R1600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N5100 vs Ryzen Embedded R1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N5100

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 6W instead of 25W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen Embedded R1600

2020

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,276 vs 3,305).
❌316.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 6W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N5100 better than Ryzen Embedded R1600?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Embedded R1600 is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N5100 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N5100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N5100 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N5100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N5100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N5100 vs Ryzen Embedded R1600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N5100

The Celeron N5100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,305 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen Embedded R1600

The Ryzen Embedded R1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,276 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N5100 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N5100 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N5100 versus 3.1 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1600 — a 10.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R1600 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron N5100 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5100 scores 3,305 against the Ryzen Embedded R1600's 3,276 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron N5100. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron N5100	Ryzen Embedded R1600
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	2.6 GHz+136%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.5 MB (total)+200%	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Jasper Lake (2021)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	3,305	3,276

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5100 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.