Celeron N5100
VS
Ryzen Embedded R1600

Celeron N5100 vs Ryzen Embedded R1600

Intel

Celeron N5100

4 Cores4 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2021
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1600

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron N5100 is positioned at rank #183 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N5100

#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
100%
#171
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
355%
#172
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
350%
#173
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
321%
#174
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
320%
#175
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
317%
#177
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
306%
#178
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
293%
#179
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
293%
#180
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
285%
#183
Celeron N5100
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#193
Pentium Gold 4417U
MSRP: $161|Avg: N/A
98%
#195
Atom N475
MSRP: $75|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen Embedded R1600 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron N5100 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron N5100Ryzen Embedded R1600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron N5100Ryzen Embedded R1600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N5100 and Ryzen Embedded R1600

Intel

Celeron N5100

The Celeron N5100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,305 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1600

The Ryzen Embedded R1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,276 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron N5100 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N5100 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N5100 versus 3.1 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1600 — a 10.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R1600 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron N5100 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5100 scores 3,305 against the Ryzen Embedded R1600's 3,276 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron N5100. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron N5100Ryzen Embedded R1600
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
3.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
2.6 GHz+136%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.5 MB (total)+200%
512 kB (per core)
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Jasper Lake (2021)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
3,305
3,276
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5100 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N5100Ryzen Embedded R1600
Socket
BGA1338
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0