Celeron N5100
VS
FX-4150

Celeron N5100 vs FX-4150

Intel

Celeron N5100

4 Cores4 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2021
VS
AMD

FX-4150

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N5100 is positioned at rank 183 and the FX-4150 is on rank 702, so the Celeron N5100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N5100

#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
100%
#171
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
355%
#172
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
350%
#173
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
321%
#174
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
320%
#175
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
317%
#177
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
306%
#178
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
293%
#179
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
293%
#180
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
285%
#183
Celeron N5100
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#193
Pentium Gold 4417U
MSRP: $161|Avg: N/A
98%
#195
Atom N475
MSRP: $75|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-4150

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12838%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12131%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8808%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2654%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2102%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1839%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1053%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1039%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
946%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
946%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
936%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
910%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
898%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
894%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
886%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
98%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
100%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
99%
#704
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
99%
#705
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
99%
#706
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
99%
#709
Core i3-4360T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
98%
#711
Core i5-3470S
MSRP: $184|Avg: $37
98%
#712
Core i5-4670T
MSRP: $189|Avg: $35
98%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
97%
#714
Pentium G3420
MSRP: $86|Avg: $40
97%
#715
Core i5-6500
MSRP: $239|Avg: $123
96%
#716
Core i7-4770T
MSRP: $250|Avg: $39
96%
#717
Core i3-4340
MSRP: $149|Avg: $50
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N5100 (2021) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron N5100FX-4150
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-4150 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron N5100FX-4150
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N5100 and FX-4150

Intel

Celeron N5100

The Celeron N5100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,305 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

FX-4150

The FX-4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,327 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N5100 and FX-4150 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N5100 versus 4 GHz on the FX-4150 — a 35.3% clock advantage for the FX-4150 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Celeron N5100 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the FX-4150 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5100 scores 3,305 against the FX-4150's 3,327 — a 0.7% lead for the FX-4150. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N5100 vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-4150.

FeatureCeleron N5100FX-4150
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
4 GHz+43%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
3.8 GHz+245%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB (total)
4 MB+167%
Process
10 nm-69%
32 nm
Architecture
Jasper Lake (2021)
Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark
3,305
3,327
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5100 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the FX-4150 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N5100FX-4150
Socket
BGA1338
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+100%
PCIe 2.0