Celeron N5100 vs FX-4150

Celeron N5100 vs FX-4150 Performance Spectrum

Celeron N5100

4 / 4

3,305

0.0%

3,327

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N5100 vs FX-4150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N5100 vs FX-4150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N5100

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 95W, a 89W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-4150 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,305 vs 3,327).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

FX-4150

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $137 MSRP, while Celeron N5100 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1483.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 6W.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-4150 better than Celeron N5100?

Yes. FX-4150 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-4150 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-4150 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-4150 is the better buy right now. FX-4150 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $137 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (24.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N5100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N5100 vs FX-4150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N5100

The Celeron N5100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,305 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-4150

The FX-4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,327 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N5100 and FX-4150 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N5100 versus 4 GHz on the FX-4150 — a 35.3% clock advantage for the FX-4150 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Celeron N5100 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the FX-4150 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5100 scores 3,305 against the FX-4150's 3,327 — a 0.7% lead for the FX-4150. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N5100 vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-4150.

Feature	Celeron N5100	FX-4150
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	4 GHz+43%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3.8 GHz+245%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	4 MB+167%
Process	10 nm-69%	32 nm
Architecture	Jasper Lake (2021)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	3,305	3,327

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5100 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the FX-4150 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.