Celeron N5100
PRO A8-9600
Celeron N5100 vs PRO A8-9600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron N5100 vs PRO A8-9600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron N5100 vs PRO A8-9600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron N5100
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A8-9600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,305 vs 3,318).
PRO A8-9600
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
Quick Answers
So, is PRO A8-9600 better than Celeron N5100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N5100 vs PRO A8-9600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Celeron N5100
The Celeron N5100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,305 points. Launch price was $69.
PRO A8-9600
The PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron N5100 and PRO A8-9600 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N5100 versus 3.4 GHz on the PRO A8-9600 — a 19.4% clock advantage for the PRO A8-9600 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Celeron N5100 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the PRO A8-9600 uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5100 scores 3,305 against the PRO A8-9600's 3,318 — a 0.4% lead for the PRO A8-9600.
| Feature | Celeron N5100 | PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz+182% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB (total) | 2048 kB+33% |
| Process | 10 nm-64% | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Jasper Lake (2021) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,305 | 3,318 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron N5100 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the PRO A8-9600 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron N5100 | PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1338 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron N5100 and PRO A8-9600
