A10 PRO-7800B vs Ryzen Embedded R1600

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Ryzen Embedded R1600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Ryzen Embedded R1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10 PRO-7800B

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Ryzen Embedded R1600 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Embedded R1600.

Trade-offs

❌160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.

Ryzen Embedded R1600

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10 PRO-7800B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,276 vs 3,317).
❌No integrated graphics, while A10 PRO-7800B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10 PRO-7800B.

Quick Answers

So, is A10 PRO-7800B better than Ryzen Embedded R1600?

Yes. A10 PRO-7800B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10 PRO-7800B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10 PRO-7800B is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10 PRO-7800B still makes the most sense overall. A10 PRO-7800B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R1600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Ryzen Embedded R1600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10 PRO-7800B

The A10 PRO-7800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,317 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen Embedded R1600

The Ryzen Embedded R1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,276 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10 PRO-7800B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10 PRO-7800B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A10 PRO-7800B versus 3.1 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1600 — a 22.9% clock advantage for the A10 PRO-7800B (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The A10 PRO-7800B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10 PRO-7800B scores 3,317 against the Ryzen Embedded R1600's 3,276 — a 1.2% lead for the A10 PRO-7800B.

Feature	A10 PRO-7800B	Ryzen Embedded R1600
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+26%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+35%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	3,317+1%	3,276
Geekbench 6 Single	446	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 PRO-7800B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10 PRO-7800B	Ryzen Embedded R1600
Socket	FM2+	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10 PRO-7800B) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R1600). The A10 PRO-7800B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 PRO-7800B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A10 PRO-7800B rivals Core i3-4160.