Ryzen Embedded R2514
VS
Atom x7835RE

Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs Atom x7835RE

AMD

Ryzen Embedded R2514

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022
VS
Intel

Atom x7835RE

8 Cores8 Thrd12 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7835RE

#20
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
173%
#21
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
170%
#22
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
156%
#23
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
156%
#24
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
154%
#26
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
149%
#27
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
143%
#28
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
142%
#29
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
139%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
100%
#33
Core 2 Duo P8400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
98%
#38
Core 2 Duo T8100
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
91%
#39
Atom 330
MSRP: $43|Avg: $30
90%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen Embedded R2514 leads in gaming performance. However, the Atom x7835RE is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightRyzen Embedded R2514Atom x7835RE
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($127)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Picasso (2019−2022) / 12 nm)
✨ Modern (Amston Lake (2024−2025) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen Embedded R2514Atom x7835RE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($127)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Embedded R2514 and Atom x7835RE

AMD

Ryzen Embedded R2514

The Ryzen Embedded R2514 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,731 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Atom x7835RE

The Atom x7835RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 6,795 points. Launch price was $127.

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded R2514 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Atom x7835RE offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Atom x7835RE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2514 versus 3.6 GHz on the Atom x7835RE — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R2514 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded R2514 uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Atom x7835RE uses Amston Lake (2024−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded R2514 scores 6,731 against the Atom x7835RE's 6,795 — a 0.9% lead for the Atom x7835RE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7835RE.

FeatureRyzen Embedded R2514Atom x7835RE
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+3%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz+62%
1.3 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2 MB (per module)+300%
Process
12 nm
10 nm-17%
Architecture
Picasso (2019−2022)
Amston Lake (2024−2025)
PassMark
6,731
6,795
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded R2514 uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom x7835RE uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen Embedded R2514Atom x7835RE
Socket
FP5
FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
9
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom x7835RE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)), while the Ryzen Embedded R2514 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureRyzen Embedded R2514Atom x7835RE
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)