
Ryzen Embedded V2718

Xeon E5-2669 V3
Ryzen Embedded V2718 vs Xeon E5-2669 V3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Embedded V2718 vs Xeon E5-2669 V3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Embedded V2718 vs Xeon E5-2669 V3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Embedded V2718
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 120W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 7, while Xeon E5-2669 V3 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,831 vs 16,107).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2669 V3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2669 V3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2669 V3
2015Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V2718 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌700% higher power demand at 120W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen Embedded V2718 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Embedded V2718 better than Xeon E5-2669 V3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Embedded V2718 vs Xeon E5-2669 V3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen Embedded V2718
The Ryzen Embedded V2718 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,831 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2669 V3
The Xeon E5-2669 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,107 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Embedded V2718 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2669 V3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2669 V3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.15 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2718 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2669 V3 — a 29% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V2718 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V2718 uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2669 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V2718 scores 15,831 against the Xeon E5-2669 V3's 16,107 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2669 V3. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2718 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2669 V3.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V2718 | Xeon E5-2669 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.15 GHz+34% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 2.3 GHz+35% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+275% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (2020−2023) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 15,831 | 16,107+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 654 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,124 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,551 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Embedded V2718 uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2669 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V2718 | Xeon E5-2669 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA2011-3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4 3200 MHz | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Ryzen Embedded V2718) / not specified (Xeon E5-2669 V3). The Ryzen Embedded V2718 includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 7), while the Xeon E5-2669 V3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Embedded V2718 targets Embedded.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V2718 | Xeon E5-2669 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 7 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
| Target Use | Embedded | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













