Core i7-10700
Ryzen Embedded V2718
Core i7-10700 vs Ryzen Embedded V2718 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-10700 vs Ryzen Embedded V2718 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-10700 vs Ryzen Embedded V2718: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-10700
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Embedded V2718.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.0 vs 63.3 PassMark/$ ($365 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen Embedded V2718
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $115 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $365 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 43.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 63.3 vs 44.0 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $365 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (654 vs 12,250).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-10700.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-10700 better than Ryzen Embedded V2718?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-10700 vs Ryzen Embedded V2718 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i7-10700
The Core i7-10700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,067 points. Launch price was $340.
Ryzen Embedded V2718
The Ryzen Embedded V2718 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,831 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-10700 and Ryzen Embedded V2718 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10700 versus 4.15 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2718 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-10700 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i7-10700 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V2718 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10700 scores 16,067 against the Ryzen Embedded V2718's 15,831 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i7-10700. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,250 vs 654 (179.7% advantage for the Core i7-10700). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,597 vs 1,124, a 34.8% lead for the Core i7-10700 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,926 vs 4,551 (54.1% advantage for the Core i7-10700). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2718.
| Feature | Core i7-10700 | Ryzen Embedded V2718 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+16% | 4.15 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+71% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 16,067+1% | 15,831 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,250+1773% | 654 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,597+42% | 1,124 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,926+74% | 4,551 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-10700 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V2718 uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i7-10700 versus DDR4 3200 MHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2718 — the Ryzen Embedded V2718 supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-10700 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-10700) vs 20 (Ryzen Embedded V2718) — the Ryzen Embedded V2718 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B460,H470,Z490,B560,Z590 (Core i7-10700) and SoC (Ryzen Embedded V2718).
| Feature | Core i7-10700 | Ryzen Embedded V2718 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4 3200 MHz+9% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-10700) vs true (Ryzen Embedded V2718). Both include integrated graphics — UHD 630 (Core i7-10700) and Radeon Vega 7 (Ryzen Embedded V2718) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10700 targets Gaming, Ryzen Embedded V2718 targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i7-10700 rivals Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Core i7-10700 | Ryzen Embedded V2718 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD 630 | Radeon Vega 7 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Gaming | Embedded |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-10700 was priced at $365, while the Ryzen Embedded V2718 came in at $250. On launch pricing ($365 vs $250), Ryzen Embedded V2718 was $115 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-10700 delivers 44.0 pts/$ vs 63.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V2718 — making the Ryzen Embedded V2718 the 36% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-10700 | Ryzen Embedded V2718 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $365 | $250-32% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.0 | 63.3+44% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-10700 and Ryzen Embedded V2718
