
Core i7-10700

Core Ultra 7 155U
Core i7-10700 vs Core Ultra 7 155U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-10700 vs Core Ultra 7 155U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-10700 vs Core Ultra 7 155U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-10700
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 630, while Core Ultra 7 155U needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 7 155U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,067 vs 16,185).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $365 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 155U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 155U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 7 155U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-10700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-10700.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-10700 better than Core Ultra 7 155U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-10700 vs Core Ultra 7 155U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-10700
The Core i7-10700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,067 points. Launch price was $340.

Core Ultra 7 155U
The Core Ultra 7 155U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,185 points. Launch price was $490.
Processing Power
The Core i7-10700 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 155U offers 12 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 7 155U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10700 versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155U — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i7-10700 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 155U uses Meteor Lake-P (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10700 scores 16,067 against the Core Ultra 7 155U's 16,185 — a 0.7% lead for the Core Ultra 7 155U. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 155U.
| Feature | Core i7-10700 | Core Ultra 7 155U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 14+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+71% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+33% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+12700% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Meteor Lake-P (2023) |
| PassMark | 16,067 | 16,185 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,250 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,597 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,926 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-10700 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 7 155U uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-10700 | Core Ultra 7 155U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-10700) / not specified (Core Ultra 7 155U). The Core i7-10700 includes integrated graphics (UHD 630), while the Core Ultra 7 155U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-10700 rivals Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Core i7-10700 | Core Ultra 7 155U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













