Core i7-10700 vs Xeon D-2733NT

Intel

Core i7-10700

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2020
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon D-2733NT

8 Cores16 Thrd80 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2022
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-10700 vs Xeon D-2733NT Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-10700 vs Xeon D-2733NT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-10700 vs Xeon D-2733NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-10700

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +29.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 630, while Xeon D-2733NT needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon D-2733NT.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (16,067 vs 16,206).
  • Launch MSRP is still $365 MSRP, while Xeon D-2733NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon D-2733NT

2022

Why buy it

  • +0.9% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-10700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-10700.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-10700 better than Xeon D-2733NT?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-2733NT makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-10700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-2733NT is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-10700 is the better buy right now. Core i7-10700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $365 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 29.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon D-2733NT is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (44.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon D-2733NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-10700 vs Xeon D-2733NT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-10700

The Core i7-10700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,067 points. Launch price was $340.

Intel

Xeon D-2733NT

The Xeon D-2733NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,206 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-10700 and Xeon D-2733NT share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10700 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-2733NT — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i7-10700 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-10700 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon D-2733NT uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10700 scores 16,067 against the Xeon D-2733NT's 16,206 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon D-2733NT. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700 vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2733NT.

FeatureCore i7-10700Xeon D-2733NT
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+50%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+38%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)+7%
15 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+20380%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark
16,067
16,206
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,250
Geekbench 6 Single
1,597
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,926
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-10700 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-2733NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-10700Xeon D-2733NT
Socket
LGA1200
FCBGA2579
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-10700) / not specified (Xeon D-2733NT). The Core i7-10700 includes integrated graphics (UHD 630), while the Xeon D-2733NT requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-10700 rivals Ryzen 7 3700X.

FeatureCore i7-10700Xeon D-2733NT
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming