Core i7-10700 vs Xeon E-2336

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-10700 vs Xeon E-2336 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-10700 vs Xeon E-2336: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-10700

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 630, while Xeon E-2336 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E-2336.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,067 vs 16,136).
❌Launch MSRP is still $365 MSRP, while Xeon E-2336 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E-2336

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-10700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-10700.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2336 better than Core i7-10700?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2336 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-10700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2336 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2336 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i7-10700 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E-2336 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $365 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-10700 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 8.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-10700 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (44.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2336 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-10700 vs Xeon E-2336 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-10700

The Core i7-10700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,067 points. Launch price was $340.

Xeon E-2336

The Xeon E-2336 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 16,136 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-10700 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E-2336 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-10700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10700 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2336 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-10700 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E-2336 uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10700 scores 16,067 against the Xeon E-2336's 16,136 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E-2336. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2336.

Feature	Core i7-10700	Xeon E-2336
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)+33%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Rocket Lake-E (2021)
PassMark	16,067	16,136
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,250	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,597	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,926	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Core i7-10700	Xeon E-2336
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-10700) / not specified (Xeon E-2336). The Core i7-10700 includes integrated graphics (UHD 630), while the Xeon E-2336 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-10700 rivals Ryzen 7 3700X.