PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 5 120U

2024

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-10700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-10700.

Core i7-10700

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 630, while Core 5 120U needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 5 120U.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,067 vs 16,225).
❌Launch MSRP is still $365 MSRP, while Core 5 120U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core 5 120U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Core 5 120U

2024

Core i7-10700

2020

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 630, while Core 5 120U needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 5 120U.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-10700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-10700.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,067 vs 16,225).
❌Launch MSRP is still $365 MSRP, while Core 5 120U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core 5 120U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 5 120U better than Core i7-10700?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i7-10700 is ahead with a 18.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 5 120U pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark. Core i7-10700 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 5 120U is the better fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 5 120U is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i7-10700 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core 5 120U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $365 MSRP, and it gives you 1% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Core i7-10700 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 18.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-10700 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (44.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 5 120U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core 5 120U Benchmark Check

Core i7-10700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core 5 120U	Core i7-10700
1080p
low	271 FPS	292 FPS
medium	243 FPS	259 FPS
high	205 FPS	219 FPS
ultra	177 FPS	188 FPS
1440p
low	230 FPS	239 FPS
medium	185 FPS	191 FPS
high	151 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	138 FPS
4K
low	160 FPS	166 FPS
medium	130 FPS	135 FPS
high	100 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	91 FPS

Open Core 5 120U Open Core i7-10700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core 5 120U	Core i7-10700
1080p
low	233 FPS	402 FPS
medium	193 FPS	402 FPS
high	175 FPS	402 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	363 FPS
1440p
low	208 FPS	402 FPS
medium	179 FPS	402 FPS
high	162 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	310 FPS
4K
low	156 FPS	349 FPS
medium	140 FPS	295 FPS
high	134 FPS	273 FPS
ultra	114 FPS	235 FPS

Open Core 5 120U Open Core i7-10700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core 5 120U	Core i7-10700
1080p
low	406 FPS	402 FPS
medium	406 FPS	402 FPS
high	406 FPS	402 FPS
ultra	406 FPS	402 FPS
1440p
low	406 FPS	402 FPS
medium	406 FPS	402 FPS
high	406 FPS	402 FPS
ultra	406 FPS	402 FPS
4K
low	406 FPS	402 FPS
medium	406 FPS	402 FPS
high	406 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	341 FPS	329 FPS

Open Core 5 120U Open Core i7-10700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core 5 120U	Core i7-10700
1080p
low	406 FPS	402 FPS
medium	406 FPS	402 FPS
high	406 FPS	402 FPS
ultra	406 FPS	402 FPS
1440p
low	406 FPS	402 FPS
medium	406 FPS	402 FPS
high	406 FPS	402 FPS
ultra	406 FPS	402 FPS
4K
low	406 FPS	402 FPS
medium	406 FPS	402 FPS
high	406 FPS	402 FPS
ultra	406 FPS	402 FPS

Open Core 5 120U Open Core i7-10700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120U and Core i7-10700

Core 5 120U

The Core 5 120U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 16,225 points. Launch price was $299.

Core i7-10700

The Core i7-10700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,067 points. Launch price was $340.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 5 120U packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-10700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 5 120U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core 5 120U versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10700 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core 5 120U (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core 5 120U uses the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-10700 uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120U scores 16,225 against the Core i7-10700's 16,067 — a 1% lead for the Core 5 120U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 120U vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700.

Feature	Core 5 120U	Core i7-10700
Cores / Threads	10 / 12+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5 GHz+4%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.4 GHz	2.9 GHz+107%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256K (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	16,225	16,067
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	12,250
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,597
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	7,926

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 5 120U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-10700 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 5 120U	Core i7-10700
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 120U) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-10700). The Core i7-10700 includes integrated graphics (UHD 630), while the Core 5 120U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-10700 rivals Ryzen 7 3700X.