Core 5 120U vs Xeon 6325P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 5 120U vs Xeon 6325P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 5 120U vs Xeon 6325P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 5 120U

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 15W instead of 55W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,225 vs 16,346).

Xeon 6325P

2025

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 120U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Core 5 120U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌266.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6325P better than Core 5 120U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 6325P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core 5 120U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6325P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6325P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6325P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core 5 120U is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (58.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6325P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 10/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 5 120U vs Xeon 6325P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 5 120U

The Core 5 120U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 16,225 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon 6325P

The Xeon 6325P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 16,346 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 5 120U packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon 6325P offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core 5 120U has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core 5 120U versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon 6325P — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core 5 120U (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core 5 120U uses the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon 6325P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120U scores 16,225 against the Xeon 6325P's 16,346 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon 6325P. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core 5 120U	Xeon 6325P
Cores / Threads	10 / 12+150%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	5 GHz+4%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.4 GHz	3.5 GHz+150%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024)	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	16,225	16,346

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 5 120U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6325P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.