Core 5 120U vs Xeon E7-4809 v2

Intel

Core 5 120U

10 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 5 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E7-4809 v2

6 Cores12 Thrd105 WWMax: none2014
Similar parts
·······

Core 5 120U vs Xeon E7-4809 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 5 120U vs Xeon E7-4809 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 5 120U vs Xeon E7-4809 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 5 120U

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +35.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (16,225 vs 16,471).

Xeon E7-4809 v2

2014

Why buy it

  • +1.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 120U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
  • Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core 5 120U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 5 120U better than Xeon E7-4809 v2?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7-4809 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core 5 120U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-4809 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 5 120U still makes the most sense overall. Core 5 120U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 35.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 5 120U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2014) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core 5 120U vs Xeon E7-4809 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core 5 120U

The Core 5 120U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 16,225 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon E7-4809 v2

The Xeon E7-4809 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to none. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 16,471 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core 5 120U packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E7-4809 v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 5 120U has 4 more cores. The Core 5 120U is built on the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core 5 120U scores 16,225 against the Xeon E7-4809 v2's 16,471 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon E7-4809 v2. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 120U vs 12 MB on the Xeon E7-4809 v2.

FeatureCore 5 120UXeon E7-4809 v2
Cores / Threads
10 / 12+67%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
5 GHz
none
Base Clock
1.4 GHz
1.9 GHz+36%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm-55%
22 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024)
PassMark
16,225
16,471+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 5 120U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E7-4809 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 5 120UXeon E7-4809 v2
Socket
FCBGA1744
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0