
Core 5 120U

Core i7-10700F
Core 5 120U vs Core i7-10700F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 5 120U vs Core i7-10700F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 5 120U vs Core i7-10700F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 5 120U
2024Why buy it
- β +0.5% higher PassMark.
- β Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βSmaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-10700F.
Core i7-10700F
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Core 5 120U.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (16,139 vs 16,225).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $310 MSRP, while Core 5 120U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core 5 120U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 120U better than Core i7-10700F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 5 120U vs Core i7-10700F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 5 120U
The Core 5 120U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 16,225 points. Launch price was $299.

Core i7-10700F
The Core i7-10700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 16,139 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120U packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-10700F offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Core 5 120U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core 5 120U versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10700F β a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core 5 120U (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core 5 120U uses the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-10700F uses Comet Lake (2020β2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120U scores 16,225 against the Core i7-10700F's 16,139 β a 0.5% lead for the Core 5 120U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 120U vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700F.
| Feature | Core 5 120U | Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+4% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 2.9 GHz+107% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) | Comet Lake (2020β2025) |
| PassMark | 16,225 | 16,139 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 12,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,250 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 7,800 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 120U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-10700F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 120U | Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | No |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 120U) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-10700F). Primary use case: Core i7-10700F targets Gaming/Content Creation. Direct competitor: Core i7-10700F rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core 5 120U | Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| IGPU Model | β | None |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | β | Gaming/Content Creation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













