Ryzen Embedded V2718 vs Xeon E5-2690 v3

Ryzen Embedded V2718 vs Xeon E5-2690 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Embedded V2718

8 / 16

15,831

0.0%

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2690 v3

12 / 24

16,027

+1.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded V2718 vs Xeon E5-2690 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded V2718 vs Xeon E5-2690 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded V2718

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,840 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $2,090 MSRP).
✅Delivers 725.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 63.3 vs 7.7 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $2,090 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 135W, a 120W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 7, while Xeon E5-2690 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (15,831 vs 16,027).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2690 v3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2690 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V2718 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.7 vs 63.3 PassMark/$ ($2,090 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
❌800% higher power demand at 135W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen Embedded V2718 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded V2718 better than Xeon E5-2690 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2690 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded V2718 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2690 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded V2718 is the better buy right now. Ryzen Embedded V2718 comes in $1,840 cheaper on MSRP at $250 MSRP versus $2,090 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2690 v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. It is also 725.8% better value on MSRP (63.3 vs 7.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V2718 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen Embedded V2718 vs Xeon E5-2690 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Embedded V2718

The Ryzen Embedded V2718 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,831 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2690 v3

The Xeon E5-2690 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 16,027 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded V2718 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2690 v3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2690 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.15 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2718 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2690 v3 — a 17% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V2718 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V2718 uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2690 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V2718 scores 15,831 against the Xeon E5-2690 v3's 16,027 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2690 v3. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2718 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2690 v3.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2718	Xeon E5-2690 v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	4.15 GHz+19%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	2.6 GHz+53%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+275%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Renoir (2020−2023)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	15,831	16,027+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	654	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,124	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,551	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded V2718 uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2690 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4 3200 MHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2718 versus DDR4-2133 on the Xeon E5-2690 v3 — the Ryzen Embedded V2718 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2690 v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen Embedded V2718) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2690 v3). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen Embedded V2718) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2690 v3) — the Xeon E5-2690 v3 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen Embedded V2718) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2690 v3).

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2718	Xeon E5-2690 v3
Socket	FP6	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4 3200 MHz+50%	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	768 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	40+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Ryzen Embedded V2718) / not specified (Xeon E5-2690 v3). The Ryzen Embedded V2718 includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 7), while the Xeon E5-2690 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Embedded V2718 targets Embedded.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2718	Xeon E5-2690 v3
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon Vega 7	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—
Target Use	Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Embedded V2718 was priced at $250, while the Xeon E5-2690 v3 came in at $2090. On launch pricing ($250 vs $2090), Ryzen Embedded V2718 was $1840 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Embedded V2718 delivers 63.3 pts/$ vs 7.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2690 v3 — making the Ryzen Embedded V2718 the 156.8% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2718	Xeon E5-2690 v3
MSRP	$250-88%	$2090
Performance per Dollar	63.3+722%	7.7
Release Date	2020	2014

Search Ryzen Embedded V2718 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2690 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.