
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs Core Ultra 9 275HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Core Ultra 9 275HX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 275HX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($85) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-HX (2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($85) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Core Ultra 9 275HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 54,763 points. Launch price was $1,399.

Core Ultra 9 275HX
The Core Ultra 9 275HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 56,018 points. Launch price was $600.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X packs 24 cores / 48 threads, matching the Core Ultra 9 275HX's 24 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X versus 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 275HX — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 275HX (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 275HX uses Arrow Lake-HX (2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X scores 54,763 against the Core Ultra 9 275HX's 56,018 — a 2.3% lead for the Core Ultra 9 275HX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,270 vs 2,835, a 76.2% lead for the Core Ultra 9 275HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 275HX.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 24 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 5.4 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+41% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB+256% | 36 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+500% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) |
| PassMark | 54,763 | 56,018+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 34,260 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,270 | 2,835+123% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 17,908 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 9 275HX uses FCBGA2114 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 275HX — the Core Ultra 9 275HX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 256 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) vs 2 (Core Ultra 9 275HX). PCIe lanes: 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) vs 24 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) — the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) and HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 9 275HX).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | FCBGA2114 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 88+267% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 9 275HX). The Core Ultra 9 275HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 275HX targets High-End Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 3960X rivals Core i9-10900X; Core Ultra 9 275HX rivals Ryzen 9 9955HX.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel Arc Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High-End Gaming Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















