Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
VS
Xeon Platinum 8358

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs Xeon Platinum 8358

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

24 Cores48 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8358

32 Cores64 Thrd250 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
484%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
457%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
332%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
100%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
79%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
69%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
40%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
39%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
36%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
36%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
35%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
34%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
34%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
34%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
33%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
33%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
32%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
32%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
31%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8358

#452
EPYC 9755
MSRP: $12984|Avg: $10931
108%
#454
Xeon Platinum 8368
MSRP: $7214|Avg: $429
108%
#456
EPYC 9575F
MSRP: $11791|Avg: $9238
106%
#457
EPYC 7642
MSRP: $4775|Avg: $850
105%
#458
EPYC 7573X
MSRP: $5590|Avg: $3580
105%
#459
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
MSRP: $6497|Avg: $6497
104%
#460
Xeon Gold 6242R
MSRP: $2977|Avg: $779
102%
#460
Xeon E5-2686 V3
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $160
102%
#462
Xeon W-2175
MSRP: $1947|Avg: $180
102%
#463
EPYC 75F3
MSRP: $5383|Avg: $2799
101%
#464
Xeon W-3375
MSRP: $4951|Avg: $6000
101%
#466
Xeon Platinum 8358
MSRP: $4607|Avg: $3145
100%
#467
EPYC 7713
MSRP: $7060|Avg: $1299
100%
#467
EPYC 7662
MSRP: $6150|Avg: $1266
100%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
97%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
97%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
97%
#472
EPYC 9845
MSRP: $13564|Avg: $8670
96%
#473
EPYC 7F32
MSRP: $2100|Avg: $179
94%
#474
EPYC 9654P
MSRP: $10625|Avg: $5345
93%
#475
EPYC 9965
MSRP: $14813|Avg: $10000
92%
#476
EPYC 9745
MSRP: $12141|Avg: $10588
91%
#477
EPYC 7J13
MSRP: $7890|Avg: $150
91%
#478
EPYC 7702
MSRP: $6450|Avg: $2035
91%
#479
EPYC 7763
MSRP: $7890|Avg: $1513
91%
#480
EPYC 9734
MSRP: $9600|Avg: $6598
90%
#481
Xeon Platinum 8160M
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $350
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Xeon Platinum 8358 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightRyzen Threadripper 3960XXeon Platinum 8358
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($85)
⚠️ Higher cost ($3,145)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm)
✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X leads not only in performance but also in value. It is effectively 97% cheaper ($85 vs $3,145) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightRyzen Threadripper 3960XXeon Platinum 8358
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+3624%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($85)
⚠️ Higher cost ($3,145)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 8358

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 54,763 points. Launch price was $1,399.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8358

The Xeon Platinum 8358 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 54,416 points. Launch price was $3,950.

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8358 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8358 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8358 — a 27.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8358 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X scores 54,763 against the Xeon Platinum 8358's 54,416 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8358.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 3960XXeon Platinum 8358
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+32%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+46%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
128 MB+167%
48 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
7 nm, 12 nm-30%
10 nm
Architecture
Matisse (2019−2020)
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark
54,763
54,416
Cinebench R23 Multi
34,260
Geekbench 6 Single
1,270
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8358 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8358 — the Xeon Platinum 8358 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8358 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8358). PCIe lanes: 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8358) — the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8358).

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 3960XXeon Platinum 8358
Socket
TR4
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
3200+79900%
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+6553500%
4096
RAM Channels
4
8+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
88+38%
64
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8358 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8358). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 3960X rivals Core i9-10900X; Xeon Platinum 8358 rivals EPYC 7543.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 3960XXeon Platinum 8358
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X launched at $1399 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8358 debuted at $4607. At current prices ($85 vs $3145), the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is $3060 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X delivers 644.3 pts/$ vs 17.3 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8358 — making the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X the 189.5% better value option.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 3960XXeon Platinum 8358
MSRP
$1399-70%
$4607
Avg Price (30d)
$85-97%
$3145
Performance per Dollar
644.3+3624%
17.3
Release Date
2019
2021