
EPYC 4545P

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
EPYC 4545P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4545P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4545P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4545P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $850 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 152.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 98.8 vs 39.1 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen Threadripper 3960X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (54,255 vs 54,763).
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅214.3% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.1 vs 98.8 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4545P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4545P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 3960X better than EPYC 4545P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4545P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4545P
The EPYC 4545P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,255 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 54,763 points. Launch price was $1,399.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4545P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4545P versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X — a 18.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 4545P (base: 3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 4545P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4545P scores 54,255 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X's 54,763 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4545P vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+20% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 128 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 54,255 | 54,763 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 34,260 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,270 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4545P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4545P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X — the EPYC 4545P supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4545P) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4545P) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4545P) and AMD TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X).
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+75% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 88+214% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the EPYC 4545P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4545P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X). The EPYC 4545P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4545P rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen Threadripper 3960X rivals Core i9-10900X.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4545P was priced at $549, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X came in at $1399. On launch pricing ($549 vs $1399), EPYC 4545P was $850 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4545P delivers 98.8 pts/$ vs 39.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X — making the EPYC 4545P the 86.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-61% | $1399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 98.8+153% | 39.1 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














