EPYC 4545P vs Xeon Platinum 8160M

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4545P

16 Cores32 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8160M

24 Cores48 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4545P vs Xeon Platinum 8160M Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4545P

16 / 32

54,255

+2.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Xeon Platinum 8160M

24 / 48

53,158

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4545P vs Xeon Platinum 8160M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4545P vs Xeon Platinum 8160M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4545P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).
✅Costs $4,451 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $5,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 829.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 98.8 vs 10.6 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $5,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Platinum 8160M

2017

Why buy it

✅71.4% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4545P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (53,158 vs 54,255).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.6 vs 98.8 PassMark/$ ($5,000 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4545P better than Xeon Platinum 8160M?

Yes. EPYC 4545P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 27.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4545P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 27.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4545P is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4545P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4545P comes in $4,451 cheaper on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $5,000 MSRP, and it still gives you a 27.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 829.5% better value on MSRP (98.8 vs 10.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4545P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2017), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, 93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4545P vs Xeon Platinum 8160M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4545P

The EPYC 4545P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,255 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon Platinum 8160M

The Xeon Platinum 8160M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 53,158 points. Launch price was $7,704.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4545P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8160M offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8160M has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4545P versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8160M — a 37.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 4545P (base: 3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 4545P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8160M uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4545P scores 54,255 against the Xeon Platinum 8160M's 53,158 — a 2% lead for the EPYC 4545P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4545P vs 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8160M.

Feature	EPYC 4545P	Xeon Platinum 8160M
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+46%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+43%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+94%	33 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	24 MB+2300%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Grado (2025)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	54,255+2%	53,158
Geekbench 6 Single	—	850
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	15,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4545P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8160M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4545P versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8160M — the EPYC 4545P supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8160M supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4545P) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8160M). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4545P) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8160M) — the Xeon Platinum 8160M offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4545P) and C621 (Xeon Platinum 8160M).

Feature	EPYC 4545P	Xeon Platinum 8160M
Socket	AM5	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	5600+110%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	1536 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	48+71%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4545P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4545P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8160M). The EPYC 4545P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Platinum 8160M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8160M targets Datacenter. Direct competitor: EPYC 4545P rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Xeon Platinum 8160M rivals EPYC 7401.

Feature	EPYC 4545P	Xeon Platinum 8160M
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Datacenter

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4545P was priced at $549, while the Xeon Platinum 8160M came in at $5000. On launch pricing ($549 vs $5000), EPYC 4545P was $4451 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4545P delivers 98.8 pts/$ vs 10.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8160M — making the EPYC 4545P the 161.1% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4545P	Xeon Platinum 8160M
MSRP	$549-89%	$5000
Performance per Dollar	98.8+832%	10.6
Release Date	2025	2017

Search EPYC 4545P on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8160M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.