
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Xeon w9-3495X
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X vs Xeon w9-3495X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X vs Xeon w9-3495X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X vs Xeon w9-3495X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +21.9% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 105 MB).
- β Costs $4,390 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
- β Delivers 262.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 55.7 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (65,824 vs 72,560).
Xeon w9-3495X
2023Why buy it
- β +10.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- β 27.3% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 7960X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βSmaller total L3 cache (105 MB vs 128 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 55.7 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w9-3495X better than Ryzen Threadripper 7960X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X vs Xeon w9-3495X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 7960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 83,554 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Xeon w9-3495X
The Xeon w9-3495X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023β2024) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 90,441 points. Launch price was $5,889.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 7960X packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w9-3495X offers 56 cores / 112 threads β the Xeon w9-3495X has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3495X β a 9.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X (base: 4.2 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 7960X uses the Storm Peak (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023β2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X scores 83,554 against the Xeon w9-3495X's 90,441 β a 7.9% lead for the Xeon w9-3495X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 65,824 vs 72,560 (9.7% advantage for the Xeon w9-3495X). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 2,780 vs 2,136, a 26.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 24,000 vs 18,600 (25.4% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X vs 105 MB on the Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7960X | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 56 / 112+133% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+10% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+121% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+22% | 105 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Storm Peak (2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023β2024) |
| PassMark | 83,554 | 90,441+8% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 65,824 | 72,560+10% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,780+30% | 2,136 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 24,000+29% | 18,600 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 7960X uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3495X β the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w9-3495X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB β 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 7960X) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3495X). PCIe lanes: 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 7960X) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3495X) β the Xeon w9-3495X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 7960X) and W790 (Xeon w9-3495X).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7960X | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+8% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB | 4096 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 112+27% |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support true virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon w9-3495X targets Ultimate Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 7960X rivals Xeon w7-3445; Xeon w9-3495X rivals Threadripper PRO 7995WX.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7960X | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | β | Ultimate Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X was priced at $1499, while the Xeon w9-3495X came in at $5889. On launch pricing ($1499 vs $5889), Ryzen Threadripper 7960X was $4390 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X delivers 55.7 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3495X β making the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X the 113.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7960X | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499-75% | $5889 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.7+262% | 15.4 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














