EPYC 9454
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
EPYC 9454 vs Ryzen Threadripper 7960X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9454 vs Ryzen Threadripper 7960X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9454 vs Ryzen Threadripper 7960X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9454
2022Why buy it
- ✅+5.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 290W instead of 350W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 7960X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.8 vs 55.7 PassMark/$ ($5,225 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,726 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 231.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 55.7 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (83,554 vs 87,961).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌20.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 290W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 7960X better than EPYC 9454?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9454 vs Ryzen Threadripper 7960X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9454
The EPYC 9454 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 87,961 points. Launch price was $5,225.
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 7960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 83,554 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9454 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 9454 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454 versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X — a 33% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X (base: 2.75 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 9454 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9454 scores 87,961 against the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X's 83,554 — a 5.1% lead for the EPYC 9454. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9454 vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X.
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen Threadripper 7960X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+100% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 5.3 GHz+39% |
| Base Clock | 2.75 GHz | 4.2 GHz+53% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 87,961+5% | 83,554 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 65,824 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,780 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 24,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9454 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9454 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X — the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9454 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9454) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 7960X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9454) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 7960X) — the EPYC 9454 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9454) and TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 7960X).
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen Threadripper 7960X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-5200+8% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+500% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+200% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9454) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 7960X). Primary use case: EPYC 9454 targets Data Center. Direct competitor: EPYC 9454 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Ryzen Threadripper 7960X rivals Xeon w7-3445.
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen Threadripper 7960X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9454 was priced at $5225, while the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X came in at $1499. On launch pricing ($5225 vs $1499), Ryzen Threadripper 7960X was $3726 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9454 delivers 16.8 pts/$ vs 55.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X the 107.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen Threadripper 7960X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5225 | $1499-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.8 | 55.7+232% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9454 and Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
