EPYC 9454 vs Xeon Platinum 8470

AMD

EPYC 9454

48 Cores96 Thrd290 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2022
EPYC family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8470

52 Cores104 Thrd350 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2023
Similar parts

EPYC 9454 vs Xeon Platinum 8470 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9454 vs Xeon Platinum 8470 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9454 vs Xeon Platinum 8470: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9454

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +143.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 105 MB).
  • Costs $4,134 less on MSRP ($5,225 MSRP vs $9,359 MSRP).
  • Delivers 75.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.8 vs 9.6 PassMark/$ ($5,225 MSRP vs $9,359 MSRP).
  • Draws 290W instead of 350W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (87,961 vs 89,850).

Xeon Platinum 8470

2023

Why buy it

  • +2.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9454 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (105 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($9,359 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
  • 20.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 290W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9454 better than Xeon Platinum 8470?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9454 is ahead with a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8470 pulls ahead with 2.1% better PassMark. EPYC 9454 also has the bigger cache pool with 143.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 105 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8470 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 52 cores and 104 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9454 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9454 comes in $4,134 cheaper on MSRP at $5,225 MSRP versus $9,359 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8470 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.1% better PassMark. It is also 75.4% better value on MSRP (16.8 vs 9.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Platinum 8470 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 52 cores / 104 threads instead of 48/96. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9454 vs Xeon Platinum 8470 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9454

The EPYC 9454 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 87,961 points. Launch price was $5,225.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8470

The Xeon Platinum 8470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 89,850 points. Launch price was $9,359.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9454 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8470 offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8470 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8470 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.75 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9454 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8470 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9454 scores 87,961 against the Xeon Platinum 8470's 89,850 — a 2.1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8470. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9454 vs 105 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8470.

FeatureEPYC 9454Xeon Platinum 8470
Cores / Threads
48 / 96
52 / 104+8%
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.75 GHz+38%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+144%
105 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
5 nm, 6 nm-29%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Genoa (2022−2023)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
87,961
89,850+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9454 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8470 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9454 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9454) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8470). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9454) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8470) — the EPYC 9454 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureEPYC 9454Xeon Platinum 8470
Socket
SP5
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
6 TB+50%
4 TB
RAM Channels
12+50%
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+60%
80
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9454) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon Platinum 8470). Primary use case: EPYC 9454 targets Data Center, Xeon Platinum 8470 targets Cloud Infrastructure. Direct competitor: EPYC 9454 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon Platinum 8470 rivals EPYC 9534.

FeatureEPYC 9454Xeon Platinum 8470
Integrated GPU
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use
Data Center
Cloud Infrastructure
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9454 was priced at $5225, while the Xeon Platinum 8470 came in at $9359. On launch pricing ($5225 vs $9359), EPYC 9454 was $4134 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9454 delivers 16.8 pts/$ vs 9.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8470 — making the EPYC 9454 the 54.7% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9454Xeon Platinum 8470
MSRP
$5225-44%
$9359
Performance per Dollar
16.8+75%
9.6
Release Date
2022
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.