EPYC 9454 vs Xeon w9-3495X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9454

48 Cores96 Thrd290 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w9-3495X

56 Cores112 Thrd350 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Similar parts

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9454 vs Xeon w9-3495X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9454

48 / 96

87,961

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Xeon w9-3495X

56 / 112

90,441

+2.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9454 vs Xeon w9-3495X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9454 vs Xeon w9-3495X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9454

2022

Why buy it

✅+143.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 105 MB).
✅Costs $664 less on MSRP ($5,225 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
✅Delivers 9.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.8 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($5,225 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
✅Draws 290W instead of 350W, a 60W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3495X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (87,961 vs 90,441).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon w9-3495X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (105 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
❌20.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 290W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w9-3495X better than EPYC 9454?

Yes. Xeon w9-3495X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w9-3495X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3495X is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.8% better PassMark, backed by 56 cores and 112 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w9-3495X is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9454 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon w9-3495X comes in 12.7% more expensive on MSRP at $5,889 MSRP versus $5,225 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9454 is also 9.6% better value on MSRP (16.8 vs 15.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w9-3495X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), more multi-core headroom with 56 cores / 112 threads instead of 48/96, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9454 vs Xeon w9-3495X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9454

The EPYC 9454 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 87,961 points. Launch price was $5,225.

Xeon w9-3495X

The Xeon w9-3495X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 90,441 points. Launch price was $5,889.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9454 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon w9-3495X offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon w9-3495X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3495X — a 23.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3495X (base: 2.75 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The EPYC 9454 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9454 scores 87,961 against the Xeon w9-3495X's 90,441 — a 2.8% lead for the Xeon w9-3495X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9454 vs 105 MB on the Xeon w9-3495X.

Feature	EPYC 9454	Xeon w9-3495X
Cores / Threads	48 / 96	56 / 112+17%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	4.8 GHz+26%
Base Clock	2.75 GHz+45%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+144%	105 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	87,961	90,441+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	72,560
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,136
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	18,600

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9454 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9454 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9454) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3495X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9454) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3495X) — the EPYC 9454 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9454) and W790 (Xeon w9-3495X).

Feature	EPYC 9454	Xeon w9-3495X
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9454) vs true (Xeon w9-3495X). Primary use case: EPYC 9454 targets Data Center, Xeon w9-3495X targets Ultimate Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9454 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon w9-3495X rivals Threadripper PRO 7995WX.

Feature	EPYC 9454	Xeon w9-3495X
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	true
Target Use	Data Center	Ultimate Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9454 was priced at $5225, while the Xeon w9-3495X came in at $5889. On launch pricing ($5225 vs $5889), EPYC 9454 was $664 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9454 delivers 16.8 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3495X — making the EPYC 9454 the 9.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9454	Xeon w9-3495X
MSRP	$5225-11%	$5889
Performance per Dollar	16.8+9%	15.4
Release Date	2022	2023

Search EPYC 9454 on Amazon

Search Xeon w9-3495X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.