EPYC 9454 vs Xeon 6780E

EPYC 9454 vs Xeon 6780E Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9454

48 / 96

87,961

+1.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Xeon 6780E

144 / 144

86,734

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9454 vs Xeon 6780E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9454 vs Xeon 6780E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9454

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+137% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 108 MB).
✅Costs $6,125 less on MSRP ($5,225 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 120.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.8 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($5,225 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
✅Draws 290W instead of 330W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon 6780E

2024

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9454 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (86,734 vs 87,961).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (108 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($11,350 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9454 better than Xeon 6780E?

Yes. EPYC 9454 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9454 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9454 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 137% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 108 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9454 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9454 comes in $6,125 cheaper on MSRP at $5,225 MSRP versus $11,350 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 120.3% better value on MSRP (16.8 vs 7.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6780E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9454 vs Xeon 6780E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9454

The EPYC 9454 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 87,961 points. Launch price was $5,225.

Xeon 6780E

The Xeon 6780E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 144 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 108 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 86,734 points. Launch price was $11,350.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9454 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon 6780E offers 144 cores / 144 threads — the Xeon 6780E has 96 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon 6780E — a 23.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9454 (base: 2.75 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 9454 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon 6780E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9454 scores 87,961 against the Xeon 6780E's 86,734 — a 1.4% lead for the EPYC 9454. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9454 vs 108 MB (total) on the Xeon 6780E.

Feature	EPYC 9454	Xeon 6780E
Cores / Threads	48 / 96	144 / 144+200%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+27%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.75 GHz+25%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+137%	108 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	4 MB (per module)+300%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Sierra Forest (2024)
PassMark	87,961+1%	86,734

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9454 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6780E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9454 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6780E — the Xeon 6780E supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9454 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9454) vs 8 (Xeon 6780E). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9454) vs 88 (Xeon 6780E) — the EPYC 9454 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	EPYC 9454	Xeon 6780E
Socket	SP5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4 TB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9454) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6780E). Primary use case: EPYC 9454 targets Data Center, Xeon 6780E targets Cloud Native Compute. Direct competitor: EPYC 9454 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon 6780E rivals EPYC 9754.

Feature	EPYC 9454	Xeon 6780E
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use	Data Center	Cloud Native Compute

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9454 was priced at $5225, while the Xeon 6780E came in at $11350. On launch pricing ($5225 vs $11350), EPYC 9454 was $6125 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9454 delivers 16.8 pts/$ vs 7.6 pts/$ for the Xeon 6780E — making the EPYC 9454 the 75.1% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9454	Xeon 6780E
MSRP	$5225-54%	$11350
Performance per Dollar	16.8+121%	7.6
Release Date	2022	2024

Search EPYC 9454 on Amazon

Search Xeon 6780E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.