EPYC 9454 vs Xeon Platinum 8570

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9454

48 Cores96 Thrd290 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8570

56 Cores112 Thrd350 WWMax: 4 GHz2023

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9454 vs Xeon Platinum 8570 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9454

48 / 96

87,961

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Xeon Platinum 8570

56 / 112

93,722

+6.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9454 vs Xeon Platinum 8570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9454 vs Xeon Platinum 8570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9454

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,370 less on MSRP ($5,225 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
✅Delivers 72.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.8 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($5,225 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
✅Draws 290W instead of 350W, a 60W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (87,961 vs 93,722).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8570

2023

Why buy it

✅+6.5% higher PassMark.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9454 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
❌20.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 290W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9454 better than Xeon Platinum 8570?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9454 is ahead with a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8570 pulls ahead with 6.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8570 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.5% better PassMark, backed by 56 cores and 112 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9454 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9454 comes in $4,370 cheaper on MSRP at $5,225 MSRP versus $9,595 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8570 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 6.5% better PassMark. It is also 72.3% better value on MSRP (16.8 vs 9.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8570 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), more multi-core headroom with 56 cores / 112 threads instead of 48/96, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9454 vs Xeon Platinum 8570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9454

The EPYC 9454 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 87,961 points. Launch price was $5,225.

Xeon Platinum 8570

The Xeon Platinum 8570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 93,722 points. Launch price was $9,595.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9454 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8570 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8570 — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8570 (base: 2.75 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 9454 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9454 scores 87,961 against the Xeon Platinum 8570's 93,722 — a 6.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8570. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9454 vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8570.

Feature	EPYC 9454	Xeon Platinum 8570
Cores / Threads	48 / 96	56 / 112+17%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	4 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.75 GHz+31%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	300 MB (total)+17%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	87,961	93,722+7%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	65,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,960
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	18,960

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9454 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9454 versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8570 — the Xeon Platinum 8570 supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9454 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9454) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8570). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9454) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8570) — the EPYC 9454 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9454) and Intel C741 (Xeon Platinum 8570).

Feature	EPYC 9454	Xeon Platinum 8570
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-5600+17%
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4 TB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9454) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8570). Primary use case: EPYC 9454 targets Data Center, Xeon Platinum 8570 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9454 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon Platinum 8570 rivals AMD EPYC 9554.

Feature	EPYC 9454	Xeon Platinum 8570
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Data Center	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9454 was priced at $5225, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 came in at $9595. On launch pricing ($5225 vs $9595), EPYC 9454 was $4370 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9454 delivers 16.8 pts/$ vs 9.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8570 — making the EPYC 9454 the 53.1% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9454	Xeon Platinum 8570
MSRP	$5225-46%	$9595
Performance per Dollar	16.8+71%	9.8
Release Date	2022	2023

Search EPYC 9454 on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8570 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.