EPYC 9454
Xeon Platinum 8592+
EPYC 9454 vs Xeon Platinum 8592+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9454 vs Xeon Platinum 8592+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9454 vs Xeon Platinum 8592+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9454
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $6,375 less on MSRP ($5,225 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 132.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.8 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($5,225 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 290W instead of 350W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 320 MB).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Platinum 8592+
2023Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9454 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (84,013 vs 87,961).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($11,600 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
- ❌20.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 290W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9454 better than Xeon Platinum 8592+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9454 vs Xeon Platinum 8592+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9454
The EPYC 9454 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 87,961 points. Launch price was $5,225.
Xeon Platinum 8592+
The Xeon Platinum 8592+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,013 points. Launch price was $11,600.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9454 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8592+ has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8592+ (base: 2.75 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The EPYC 9454 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9454 scores 87,961 against the Xeon Platinum 8592+'s 84,013 — a 4.6% lead for the EPYC 9454. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9454 vs 320 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8592+.
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96 | 64 / 128+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.9 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.75 GHz+45% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 320 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 87,961+5% | 84,013 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9454 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9454 versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — the Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports up to 4096 TB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 68166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9454) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8592+). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9454) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8592+) — the EPYC 9454 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9454) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8592+).
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | 5600+17% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 4096 TB+68167% |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9454) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8592+). Primary use case: EPYC 9454 targets Data Center. Direct competitor: EPYC 9454 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon Platinum 8592+ rivals EPYC 9554.
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Data Center | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9454 was priced at $5225, while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ came in at $11600. On launch pricing ($5225 vs $11600), EPYC 9454 was $6375 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9454 delivers 16.8 pts/$ vs 7.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — making the EPYC 9454 the 79.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5225-55% | $11600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.8+133% | 7.2 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9454 and Xeon Platinum 8592+
