Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
Xeon w9-3575X
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X vs Xeon w9-3575X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X vs Xeon w9-3575X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X vs Xeon w9-3575X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+31.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 98 MB).
- ✅Costs $2,290 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $3,789 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 156.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 55.7 vs 21.8 PassMark/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $3,789 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon w9-3575X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 340W instead of 350W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅27.3% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 7960X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (60,000 vs 65,824).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (98 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.8 vs 55.7 PassMark/$ ($3,789 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 7960X better than Xeon w9-3575X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X vs Xeon w9-3575X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 7960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 83,554 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Xeon w9-3575X
The Xeon w9-3575X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 44 cores and 88 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 97.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 340 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,507 points. Launch price was $3,789.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 7960X packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w9-3575X offers 44 cores / 88 threads — the Xeon w9-3575X has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3575X — a 9.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 7960X uses the Storm Peak (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon w9-3575X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X scores 83,554 against the Xeon w9-3575X's 82,507 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 65,824 vs 60,000 (9.3% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,780 vs 2,300, a 18.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 24,000 vs 19,320 (21.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X vs 97.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3575X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7960X | Xeon w9-3575X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 44 / 88+83% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+10% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+91% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+31% | 97.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Storm Peak (2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 83,554+1% | 82,507 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 65,824+10% | 60,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,780+21% | 2,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 24,000+24% | 19,320 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 7960X uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3575X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3575X — the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w9-3575X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 7960X) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3575X). PCIe lanes: 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 7960X) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3575X) — the Xeon w9-3575X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 7960X) and W790 (Xeon w9-3575X).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7960X | Xeon w9-3575X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+8% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB | 4096 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 112+27% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support true virtualization. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 7960X rivals Xeon w7-3445; Xeon w9-3575X rivals Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7960X | Xeon w9-3575X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X was priced at $1499, while the Xeon w9-3575X came in at $3789. On launch pricing ($1499 vs $3789), Ryzen Threadripper 7960X was $2290 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X delivers 55.7 pts/$ vs 21.8 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3575X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X the 87.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7960X | Xeon w9-3575X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499-60% | $3789 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.7+156% | 21.8 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper 7960X and Xeon w9-3575X
