
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X vs Xeon 6780E

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon 6780E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6780E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($1,419) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($8,513) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Shimada Peak (2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Sierra Forest (2024) / Intel 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+542%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($1,419) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($8,513) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 9960X and Xeon 6780E

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 92,808 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Xeon 6780E
The Xeon 6780E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 144 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 108 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 86,734 points. Launch price was $11,350.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon 6780E offers 144 cores / 144 threads — the Xeon 6780E has 120 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X versus 3 GHz on the Xeon 6780E — a 55.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6780E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X scores 92,808 against the Xeon 6780E's 86,734 — a 6.8% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X vs 108 MB (total) on the Xeon 6780E.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 144 / 144+500% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+77% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+91% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+19% | 108 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 4 MB (per module)+300% |
| Process | 4 nm | Intel 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Shimada Peak (2025) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| PassMark | 92,808+7% | 86,734 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 41,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,200 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6780E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 198.4% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) vs 8 (Xeon 6780E). Both provide 88 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB | 4 TB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 88 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6780E). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X targets Content Creation / Rendering, Xeon 6780E targets Cloud Native Compute. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X rivals Xeon w7-3555; Xeon 6780E rivals EPYC 9754.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT |
| Target Use | Content Creation / Rendering | Cloud Native Compute |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X launched at $1499 MSRP, while the Xeon 6780E debuted at $11350. At current prices ($1419 vs $8513), the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is $7094 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X delivers 65.4 pts/$ vs 10.2 pts/$ for the Xeon 6780E — making the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X the 146.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499-87% | $11350 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1419-83% | $8513 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+541% | 10.2 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















