Ryzen Threadripper 9970X vs EPYC 9475F
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
EPYC 9475F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9475F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($2,442) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,592) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Shimada Peak (2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+175%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($2,442) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,592) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 9970X and EPYC 9475F
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 108,377 points. Launch price was $2,499.
EPYC 9475F
The EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,476 points. Launch price was $7,592.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 9970X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 9475F offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 9475F has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X versus 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9475F — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X (base: 4 GHz vs 3.65 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 9970X uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9475F uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X scores 108,377 against the EPYC 9475F's 122,476 — a 12.2% lead for the EPYC 9475F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,220 vs 1,960, a 48.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,244 vs 45,000 (42.4% advantage for the EPYC 9475F). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9475F.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 48 / 96+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+13% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+10% | 3.65 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Shimada Peak (2025) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 108,377 | 122,476+13% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 76,136 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,220+64% | 1,960 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,244 | 45,000+54% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 9970X uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9475F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The EPYC 9475F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 1 TB — 199.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X) vs 12 (EPYC 9475F). PCIe lanes: 92 (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X) vs 128 (EPYC 9475F) — the EPYC 9475F offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X) and SP5 (EPYC 9475F).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1 TB | 6144 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 12+200% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 92 | 128+39% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X) vs AMD-V (EPYC 9475F). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 9970X targets HEDT / Workstation, EPYC 9475F targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 9970X rivals Xeon w7-3465X; EPYC 9475F rivals Xeon 6952P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | AMD-V |
| Target Use | HEDT / Workstation | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 9970X launched at $2499 MSRP, while the EPYC 9475F debuted at $7592. At current prices ($2442 vs $7592), the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X is $5150 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X delivers 44.4 pts/$ vs 16.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 9475F — making the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X the 93.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499-67% | $7592 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2442-68% | $7592 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+176% | 16.1 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper 9970X and EPYC 9475F
