Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX vs Core Ultra 7 265F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Core Ultra 7 265F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX | Core Ultra 7 265F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($999) | ✅ More affordable ($276) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Chagall PRO (2022) / 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX | Core Ultra 7 265F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+265%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($999) | ✅ More affordable ($276) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Core Ultra 7 265F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,756 points. Launch price was $499.
Core Ultra 7 265F
The Core Ultra 7 265F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,161 points. Launch price was $379.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265F offers 20 cores / 20 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX versus 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265F — a 16.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265F (base: 4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265F uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX scores 48,756 against the Core Ultra 7 265F's 49,161 — a 0.8% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265F. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX vs 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265F.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX | Core Ultra 7 265F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 20 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 5.3 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+67% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+113% | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+500% |
| Process | 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Chagall PRO (2022) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 48,756 | 49,161 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 25,459 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 20,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265F uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265F — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX) vs 2 (Core Ultra 7 265F). PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX) vs 24 (Core Ultra 7 265F) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX) and Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 7 265F).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX | Core Ultra 7 265F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+63900% | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 256 GB+13107100% |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265F). Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 265F targets High Performance Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX rivals Xeon w5-3335.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX | Core Ultra 7 265F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High Performance Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX launched at $799 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 265F debuted at $369. At current prices ($999 vs $276), the Core Ultra 7 265F is $723 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX delivers 48.8 pts/$ vs 178.1 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 265F — making the Core Ultra 7 265F the 114% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX | Core Ultra 7 265F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $369-54% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $999 | $276-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.8 | 178.1+265% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Core Ultra 7 265F
