Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX vs Xeon 6517P

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

16 Cores32 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022
Threadripper Pro family
···
VS
Intel

Xeon 6517P

16 Cores32 Thrd190 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2025
Similar parts
·······

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX vs Xeon 6517P Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX vs Xeon 6517P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX vs Xeon 6517P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +25.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $396 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
  • Delivers 49.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.0 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
  • 45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (48,756 vs 48,810).
  • 47.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 190W.
  • Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon 6517P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6517P

2025

Why buy it

  • +0.1% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 190W instead of 280W, a 90W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.8 vs 61.0 PassMark/$ ($1,195 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6517P better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is ahead with a 25.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6517P pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6517P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon 6517P is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon 6517P comes in 49.6% more expensive on MSRP at $1,195 MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 25.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is also 49.4% better value on MSRP (61.0 vs 40.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6517P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX vs Xeon 6517P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,756 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel

Xeon 6517P

The Xeon 6517P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 48,810 points. Launch price was $1,195.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Xeon 6517P share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6517P — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX (base: 4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon 6517P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX scores 48,756 against the Xeon 6517P's 48,810 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon 6517P. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6517P.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 5955WXXeon 6517P
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
16 / 32
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+7%
4.2 GHz
Base Clock
4 GHz+25%
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB
72 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+25500%
2 MB (per core)
Process
7 nm
Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture
Chagall PRO (2022)
Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark
48,756
48,810
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6517P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX versus 6400 on the Xeon 6517P — the Xeon 6517P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6517P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX) vs 88 (Xeon 6517P) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX) and Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6517P).

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 5955WXXeon 6517P
Socket
sWRX8
LGA4710
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
3200
6400+100%
Max RAM Capacity
2048
4096+100%
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+45%
88
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6517P). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX rivals Xeon w5-3335; Xeon 6517P rivals EPYC 9554.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 5955WXXeon 6517P
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX was priced at $799, while the Xeon 6517P came in at $1195. On launch pricing ($799 vs $1195), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX was $396 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX delivers 61.0 pts/$ vs 40.8 pts/$ for the Xeon 6517P — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX the 39.6% better value option.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 5955WXXeon 6517P
MSRP
$799-33%
$1195
Performance per Dollar
61.0+50%
40.8
Release Date
2022
2025

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.