Core i9-13900F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Core i9-13900F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-13900F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-13900F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-13900F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $275 less on MSRP ($524 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 53.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 93.4 vs 61.0 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (48,756 vs 48,934).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.0 vs 93.4 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
- ❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-13900F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900F better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-13900F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i9-13900F
The Core i9-13900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,934 points. Launch price was $524.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,756 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900F packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13900F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — a 20% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900F (base: 2 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i9-13900F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900F scores 48,934 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX's 48,756 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i9-13900F. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900F vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX.
| Feature | Core i9-13900F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+22% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 4 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 64 MB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 48,934 | 48,756 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 37,326 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,801 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,199 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900F versus 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — the Core i9-13900F supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 966.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900F) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-13900F) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX).
| Feature | Core i9-13900F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+75% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 2048 GB+967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX rivals Xeon w5-3335.
| Feature | Core i9-13900F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-13900F was priced at $524, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX came in at $799. On launch pricing ($524 vs $799), Core i9-13900F was $275 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900F delivers 93.4 pts/$ vs 61.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — making the Core i9-13900F the 41.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $524-34% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 93.4+53% | 61.0 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i9-13900F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
