Core i9-13900F vs Xeon 6517P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900F vs Xeon 6517P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900F vs Xeon 6517P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $671 less on MSRP ($524 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
✅Delivers 128.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 93.4 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 190W, a 125W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6517P.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 72 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6517P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Xeon 6517P

2025

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (48,810 vs 48,934).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.8 vs 93.4 PassMark/$ ($1,195 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
❌192.3% higher power demand at 190W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-13900F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900F better than Xeon 6517P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 6517P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13900F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-13900F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900F is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900F is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900F comes in $671 cheaper on MSRP at $524 MSRP versus $1,195 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 128.6% better value on MSRP (93.4 vs 40.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6517P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and 100% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 36 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-13900F vs Xeon 6517P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900F

The Core i9-13900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,934 points. Launch price was $524.

Xeon 6517P

The Xeon 6517P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 48,810 points. Launch price was $1,195.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900F packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon 6517P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13900F versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6517P — a 26.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900F (base: 2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i9-13900F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6517P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900F scores 48,934 against the Xeon 6517P's 48,810 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i9-13900F. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900F vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6517P.

Feature	Core i9-13900F	Xeon 6517P
Cores / Threads	24 / 32+50%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.5 GHz+31%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.2 GHz+60%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	72 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	48,934	48,810
Cinebench R23 Multi	37,326	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,801	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	17,199	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6517P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900F versus 6400 on the Xeon 6517P — the Xeon 6517P supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6517P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900F) vs 8 (Xeon 6517P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900F) vs 88 (Xeon 6517P) — the Xeon 6517P offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-13900F) and Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6517P).

Feature	Core i9-13900F	Xeon 6517P
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	6400+14%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	88+340%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon 6517P rivals EPYC 9554.

Feature	Core i9-13900F	Xeon 6517P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13900F was priced at $524, while the Xeon 6517P came in at $1195. On launch pricing ($524 vs $1195), Core i9-13900F was $671 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900F delivers 93.4 pts/$ vs 40.8 pts/$ for the Xeon 6517P — making the Core i9-13900F the 78.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-13900F	Xeon 6517P
MSRP	$524-56%	$1195
Performance per Dollar	93.4+129%	40.8
Release Date	2023	2025

Search Core i9-13900F on Amazon

Search Xeon 6517P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.