Core i9-13900F vs Core Ultra 7 265F

The Core i9-13900F packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265F offers 20 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-13900F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13900F versus 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265F — a 3.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900F (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i9-13900F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265F uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900F scores 48,934 against the Core Ultra 7 265F's 49,161 — a 0.5% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 37,326 vs 25,459 (37.8% advantage for the Core i9-13900F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,801 vs 3,000, a 6.9% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 17,199 vs 20,000 (15.1% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265F). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900F vs 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265F.

The Core i9-13900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265F uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900F versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265F — the Core Ultra 7 265F supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 7 265F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900F) vs 24 (Core Ultra 7 265F) — the Core Ultra 7 265F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-13900F) and Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 7 265F).

Only the Core Ultra 7 265F has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i9-13900F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 265F targets High Performance Gaming.

At launch, the Core i9-13900F was priced at $524, while the Core Ultra 7 265F came in at $369. On launch pricing ($524 vs $369), Core Ultra 7 265F was $155 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900F delivers 93.4 pts/$ vs 133.2 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 265F — making the Core Ultra 7 265F the 35.2% better value option.

Search Core i9-13900F on AmazonSearch Core Ultra 7 265F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.