
Core i9-13900F vs EPYC 9224

Core i9-13900F

EPYC 9224
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i9-13900F
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9224
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i9-13900F | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($536) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,199) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i9-13900F | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+125%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($536) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,199) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900F and EPYC 9224

Core i9-13900F
The Core i9-13900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,934 points. Launch price was $524.

EPYC 9224
The EPYC 9224 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,573 points. Launch price was $1,825.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900F packs 24 cores / 32 threads, matching the EPYC 9224's 24 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13900F versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9224 — a 39.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900F (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i9-13900F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9224 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900F scores 48,934 against the EPYC 9224's 48,573 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-13900F. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900F vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9224.
| Feature | Core i9-13900F | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32 | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+49% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 48,934 | 48,573 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 37,326 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,801 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,199 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9224 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900F versus 4800 on the EPYC 9224 — the EPYC 9224 supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9224 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900F) vs 12 (EPYC 9224). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900F) vs 128 (EPYC 9224) — the EPYC 9224 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-13900F) and SP5 (EPYC 9224).
| Feature | Core i9-13900F | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 4800+95900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+3276700% | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 12+500% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9224). Direct competitor: EPYC 9224 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X.
| Feature | Core i9-13900F | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13900F launched at $524 MSRP, while the EPYC 9224 debuted at $1825. At current prices ($536 vs $1199), the Core i9-13900F is $663 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900F delivers 91.3 pts/$ vs 40.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 9224 — making the Core i9-13900F the 77.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900F | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $524-71% | $1825 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $536-55% | $1199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 91.3+125% | 40.5 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















